What is the purpose of education?
Consider the following passages quoted from the book “Influence:
The Psychology of Persuasion” by Dr Cialdini regarding education proceeding in
the standard classroom that could apply to nearly any public school in the
United States:
In general, here is
how it works: The teacher stands in front of the class and asks a question. Six
to ten children strain in their seats and wave their hands in the teacher’s
face, eager to be called in and show how smart they are. Several others sit
quietly with eyes averted, trying to become invisible. When the teacher calls
on one child, you see looks of disappointment and dismay on the faces of the
eager students, who missed a chance to get the teacher’s approval; and you will
see relief on the faces of the others who didn’t know the answer…. This game is
fiercely competitive and the stakes are high, because the kids are competing
for the love and approval of one of the two or three most important people in
their world.
Further, this teaching process
guarantees that the children will not learn to like and understand each other. Conjure
up your own experience. If you knew the right answer and the teacher called on
someone else, you probably hoped that he or she would make a mistake so that
you would have a chance to display your knowledge. If you were called on and
failed, or if you didn’t even raise your hand to compete, you probably envied
and resented your classmates who knew the answer. Children who fail in this
system become jealous and resentful of the successes, putting them down as
teacher’s pets or even resorting to violence against them in the school yard. The
successful students, for their part, often hold the unsuccessful children in contempt,
calling them “dumb” or “stupid”.
This competitive process does
not encourage anyone to look benevolently and happily upon his fellow students.
What kind of individuals are we trying to raise here? Are we
trying to educate our children to be competitive individuals that only care
about winning? Is this how humanity works?
Napoleon Hill states, “An educated man is not, necessarily,
one who has an abundance of general or specialized knowledge. An educated man
is one who has so developed the faculties of his mind that he may acquire
anything he wants, or its equivalent, without violating the rights of others.”
While having knowledge is important, we all agree that
having good characters are even more important. The most successful people have
always been the ones who care for others, always add value and bring progress
to the society. The primary focus of education whether in school or at home,
should be to bring out the best of an individual. The Great Being saith: Regard
man as a mine rich in gems of inestimable value. Education can, alone, cause it
to reveal its treasures, and enable mankind to benefit therefrom.
This is why spiritual education must be given to a child at
a very young age. Children need to be taught of the heavenly attributes and to love their fellow mankind. Cooperation will bring greater progress to everybody
than competition.
No comments:
Post a Comment